Knees for You Guide to Knee Replacement

Serving the Patient Community since 12/18/2006    Patricia Walter Owner/Webmaster

TKA performed with porous tantalum tibial component shows good 5-year survivorship

March 2008

SAN FRANCISCO - Total knee arthroplasty performed using a cemented monoblock porous tantalum tibial component shows high survivorship and radiographic stability at 5 years follow-up, according to a study presented here.

Thomas J. O'Keefe, MD, and colleagues at St. Joseph Mercy Hospital in Ann Arbor, Mich., evaluated the 5-year clinical and radiographic outcomes for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed using the Implex CKS knee system with a monoblock porous tantalum-polyethylene posterior-stabilized tibial component.

They displayed their results in a poster at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 75th Annual Meeting.

"The implant possesses a modulus of elasticity similar to subchondral bone, which allows for stress transfer, limits proximal stress shielding and obviates the need for a central stem to protect against offset loads. The monoblock design eliminates backside wear, thereby decreasing wear-induced particle load," the authors said in the study.

"All tibial components were implanted with a cemented horizontal surface and press-fit pegs," they noted.

Between April 2001 and June 2002, 137 consecutive TKAs were performed using the device by a single surgeon on 101 patients, primarily for osteoarthritis.

At 5 years, 28 of the 101 patients could not complete follow-up exams. Another two patients required tibial component revision at 4 years postop; one for arthrofibrosis and one for late infection.

"Therefore, 91 knees in 71 patients were available for examination at a mean follow-up of 5.2 years," the authors wrote.

At follow-up, Knee Society Scores averaged 87.1 points and range of motion (ROM) averaged 120 degrees. No patients had evidence of infection, and investigators observed no cases of deep venous thromboembolism, according to the study.

Surgeons revised one patella due to loosening caused by avascular necrosis. There was also one lateral release performed due to patellar pain and subluxation, and one synovectomy due to recurrent bleeding associated with chronic anticoagulation therapy. Surgeons also performed eight manipulations in seven patients. "Of those patients, only one patient failed to achieve 90° ROM at [the] final visit," the authors reported.

No cases were revised for either component loosening or mechanical failure. Also, there were no impending revisions and no radiographic evidence of either component loosening or osteolysis.

Additionally, "There were no radiolucent lines greater than 1 mm in depth covering more than 50% of any radiographic zone," the authors reported, noting that there was no observed cases of component migration or changes in bone density.

"Survivorship free of revision for tibial component loosening was 100% at 5 years," they wrote.

For more information:

O'Keefe TJ, Winter S, Robertson DD, et al. Five year outcome of a cemented one-piece porous tantalum tibial component in total knee replacement. #P162. Presented at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 75th Annual Meeting. March 5-9, 2008. San Francisco.




 

Advertisements
Helpful Websites

View My Stats

Web design by Patricia Walter    Copyright Knees For You 12/18/2006   

Mission Statement - Knees for You is a patient to patient guide to knee replacement. It does not provide medical advice. It is designed to support, not to replace, the relationship between patient and clinician.
Advertising - Revenue from this site is derived from commercial advertising and individual donations.
Any advertisement is distinguished by the word "advertisement"
Privacy - Knees for You does not share email addresses or personal information with any group or organization.
Content - Knees for You is not controlled or influenced by any medical companies, doctors or hospitals.
All content is controlled by Patricia Walter  -
Joint Health Sites  LLC

This site is published by Joint Health Sites LLC, which is solely responsible for its content.
The advertisements on this site are not intended by the advertisers as an endorsement of the site's content.
The advertisers shall not be liable for any errors or omissions in the site's content,
nor liable for any damages from any person's actions based in reliance on the site's content.